Data sovereignty
Your content stays on your network. No provider reads along, no training on your data.
New topic
Language models on your own hardware: confidential, predictable and under your control.
What is the deadline for complaints?
Complaints must be reported within 14 days of goods receipt. The quality management team is responsible.
QM-Manual.pdf · ch. 7.3Local AI means the language model runs on a server or workstation inside your company – not at a provider in the cloud. Your documents, queries and answers stay on your own network.
That is not an end in itself. It is the difference between ‘let's try some AI’ and an assistant you can trust with HR files, engineering drawings or client data.
With cloud services, your input leaves the company. Depending on the provider, content is stored, analysed or used to improve models. Contracts can restrict this, but technology cannot guarantee it. Anyone working with sensitive data remains dependent on promises.
Locally, you reverse that: the model is a file on your hardware. You decide which documents it reads, who uses it and when it is switched off. Updates, logs and access remain in your hands – verifiable for data protection and audits.
Cloud AI is billed per token. That is convenient, but hard to plan once many employees use it regularly. Local AI requires an investment in hardware and support. Beyond a certain usage level it is cheaper – especially if the alternative is paying for every query. We calculate both variants in advance, using your actual usage figures.
Benefits
Not every advantage carries the same weight. These six points decide in practice.
Your content stays on your network. No provider reads along, no training on your data.
A one-off investment instead of variable token bills. Support costs are calculable.
Keeps working during internet outages – important for production, labs and field service.
Answers from your manuals, contracts and wikis – including the source reference.
Model and data stay with you. You can change provider at any time.
Prompts, answers and access can be logged and reviewed.
Architecture
A local assistant is not a single program but a stack of four parts. Every part runs on your network – from document to answer.
Not every task needs a frontier model. These cases work particularly well locally because the data is confidential and the answers come from known material:
In all cases the rule is: the model drafts, a person approves. A local assistant does not replace sign-off, it speeds it up.
The honest answer: it depends on the task. This comparison helps with the decision.
| Criterion | Cloud AI | Local AI |
|---|---|---|
| Data processing | At an external provider | On your hardware |
| Cost | Subscription or per token | Hardware plus ongoing support |
| Internet | Mandatory | Not required |
| Customisation | Limited, mostly via prompts | Your documents, your models |
| Control | Provider-dependent | Entirely with you |
| Quality | Very high (frontier models) | High – depending on model and hardware |
We start small and measurable – not with a large platform nobody uses.
Use case, data types, expectations and constraints.
Model, hardware, effort and cost – with a clear recommendation.
One use case with real documents and measurable results.
Connection to file shares, Outlook, Teams or an internal web interface.
Updates, monitoring, backups and user training.
Local AI is not magic. Anyone replacing a cloud solution should know the limits:
If local is not sensible, we say so – and propose a hybrid approach: sensitive data locally, non-critical tasks in the cloud.
Local AI
We advise independently and tell you whether local is the right choice for your use case.